Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Le Berger

Pages: 1 ... 18 19 [20] 21 22
286
STUDIO + RECORDING TECHNIQUES / Re: Scale, chords, tempo & time signature.
« on: February 15, 2011, 05:40:14 pm »
pfff, 6/8, please....  ;)

I guess it depends on what you're doing and what you're after specifically.
Most of the time (current project anyway) I work intuitively and if there's something to be interpreted theoretically that comes afterwards, if at all.

When working with others in somewhat structured music, the more theoretical knowledge everyone shares, the more efficient it's likely to be. I view music theory more as a communication tool, a language, than an actual compositional tool. That's not to say that nobody composes with theory in mind or as a tool in the making, but pretty much only certain rare freaks make it work to genius level and can create music from a purely theoretical standpoint.

With that said, sometimes though, just as an intellectual exercise I guess, I'll put a few things together that I know could be structured a certain way. Like the other day sitting at a restaurant on my own waiting for a meal I composed a piece for bass drum, snare & triangle and wrote it on the back of my table mat. Don't know if I'll ever record it or anything, but I'm guessing it's the same as an architect thinking of certain specifics without actually drawing them, or something like that. It's fun to know my brain has that capacity to visualize musical elements and create them abstractly, but it's definitely not the way I compose or create music in general. I'd much rather sit down with my guitar and strum 'til the notes come to me, or toy around with samples, etc.


287
OTHER MUSIC / Re: What to look for in a label?
« on: February 14, 2011, 02:47:13 pm »
Most definitely the former, as a listener I think I'm doing fine.

I guess I can give you the backstory now, when I made the post I had been approached by some folks / netlabel, but it seemed flimsy and I didn't have much a good feeling about it. I figured some of the posters here may have the kind of experience to guide me and help me make a sound decision.

I've since then declined, but I'm still very interested to hear if anyone has something to share.
(And I realize there may be some uneasiness about this being a specific label's forum, the watchful eye of @12k! or you know, not asking anyone to bite the hand that feeds them either...)

288
ACOUSTIC ELECTRIC / Re: Lap Harps
« on: February 12, 2011, 05:47:14 pm »
Oh well, I thought those were similar enough that she'd know... seems not.

Anyway, here's a link she sent me: http://craggymtnmusic.com/lap_harp.php

hope that helps


++++++

EDIT: she brought forth new input..

verbatim
"I talked to dad; he said Music Maker doesn't ship overseas because the shipping is basically more expensive than the instrument, so not worth it. And he didn't have any alternatives on private builders.
His suggestions:
1. have someone in the US or Canada buy one and then ship it privately. Shipping will be pricey; he just sent a 'harp to Switzerland and it was around $250 with insurance. If you didn't care about insuring it (rly it's a <$40 instrument, so probably can get away without insurance), you'd look at $50ish for shipping.
2. make one, if he has the ambition/resources and can find the more specific parts (like tuning pins...most companies that make these sell to factories or luthiers, not just in batches of 10-20 pins to someone looking to make one instrument). "

289
ACOUSTIC ELECTRIC / Re: Lap Harps
« on: February 12, 2011, 08:07:53 am »
The father of a friend of mine is a maker of autoharps, and I know he does ship to the UK on occasion but for some insurance thing it's kind of a pain in the ass is what my friend told me. I have no clue if he makes lap harps though, I will inquire and let you know / repost with further info when i have it.

290
OTHER MUSIC / What to look for in a label?
« on: February 09, 2011, 04:48:23 pm »
Or mostly, what not to look for...

I figure there's a wealth of experience around these boards, probably some horror stories too.

I'm like a child wandering in the middle of a movie with no frame of reference here.
Basically, I'm asking for pointers & the things that should tip the alarm wire, so to speak.

291
OTHER MUSIC / Re: What are you listening to?
« on: February 07, 2011, 02:14:28 pm »
Listening to Fluid Radio all day...some great discoveries!

That's usually how that works.

My wallet gave me an ultimatum...

and i'm not currently listening to music, making it.

292
OTHER MUSIC / Re: What are you listening to?
« on: February 01, 2011, 01:09:09 pm »

it's not foggy here
but I can't begin to tell how much i love this album
so i won't  ;)

currently listening to last.fm's map~map similar artists radio
some are
some aren't
so it's a game of skip the song more often than not
but the occasional discovery makes it enjoyable

*edit | addendum
now on to old school piano blues
Jimmy Witherspoon atm

293
SELF PROMOTION / Re: My music-a-day project - SIGHUPyear
« on: February 01, 2011, 12:58:17 pm »
Good bump, I hadn't noticed the thread the first time around. I'll be following form soundcloud, thanks!

294
Very reassuring to know, thanks!

295
Chubby Wolf - 'The Darker Sex' 7"

Just wondering how much posthumous tampering there was, if so, by who?

& Thanks for the updates / news.

296
- What is the oldest piece of software that you are still using?
Probably Making Waves 2.something, only use it for very specific things
- What is the oldest working computer/OS that you have?
Only one computer, PC, about 3 yrs old, still runs on XP
- What is the oldest piece of (electronic) hardware you have?
Probably my Soundcraft board, 200B
- What is the oldest musical instrument (any kind) you may have?
Uhm, my voice? as I was born with it!

I used to have an old Korg PolyEnsemble synth and echo box that were probably older than me, but I got rid of them a while back.

297
Sure! The software companies work so hard to beat each other and they are making such an awesome tools, capable of doing everything in one single bundle that they are going to kill us!

As mentioned in the other thread about randomization tools and the likes, I work with a lot of outdated and somewhat restricting tools. They have the advantage of being so readily intuitive, simple, ready to go. By downsizing the scope of what can be done or tweaked with, you have to be more ingenuous to get where you wanna go. Sometimes it's a shear pain in the ass, other times it's a real brain puzzler, but then when it works, when it rly rly works, it's one of the best feelings ever. You feel comforted in the dumbass feeling that you don't need anything fancy! (and your wallet thanks you for it)

That said, I'm a sucker for the DIY culture as a general rule of thumb, and the actual quality of the end product does suffer when using improper tools for the work you set out to do.

For that reason, I'm about to overhaul everything and try to make the best of both worlds (ancient simplistic tools vs malleability of new fascinating products)

I'm scared sh*tless. I'm probably the least techy guy to graze these forums, and the scary part is not about learning new techniques or tools (that's actually pretty fun and interesting) it's the idea of having too many possibilities.

I find that you see it time and time again, people geared up to the f*cking roof and with incredibly malleable tools to produce something. The product is spic and span, the form gorgeous in every way, but there's nothing inside the house, so to speak.

Before making a buying decision, I'm gonna try a bunch of them as I have no clue which one will actually scare me the least (ha!) I'm guessing I'm simply gonna go with the one that feels most intuitive.

298
OTHER MUSIC / Re: What are you listening to?
« on: January 25, 2011, 09:13:16 pm »

299
STUDIO + RECORDING TECHNIQUES / Re: Chance and random composing tools
« on: January 25, 2011, 07:30:29 pm »
Yup, only runs in Windows as far as i know, and I don't think the program has been much updated since Windows NT, to give you an idea how light and simplistic it is. Don't expect much, it's outdated, crude, almost laughable!

I'm a sucker for those things from digital era CIRCA 'when it wasn't quite there yet', like how quickly we go through phases of new digital products and software without looking back. There isn't yet much of a 'vintage' phenomenon with those things, compared to actual instruments or hardware. The reason being pretty simple, in that department, new is pretty much always better...

But then I don't know, personally I like to try and expand or bend the intended purpose of these things. How easily accessible and understandable they are, yet as soon as something new pops up we toss them aside. Put simply, working within a tight framework without all the malleability and options of the new stuff excites creativity, ingenuity, resourcefulness, etc. Major downside being the amount of f*cking around needed to get where you wanna go.

I'm sure someday, when I have a clue what I'm doing, I'll be able to merge the two aspects...

 

300
STUDIO + RECORDING TECHNIQUES / Re: Chance and random composing tools
« on: January 25, 2011, 06:02:37 pm »
How could I forget... one of the simplest and basic softwares out there for generative music: http://www.reglos.de/musinum/

I don't know how long it's been around, and you're not looking at something that is likely to be used in any contemporary compositions, but loads of fun!

Pages: 1 ... 18 19 [20] 21 22